The Voice of Reason

Icon

political what? living in the western world

Metaphysical Warfare

To fight a fire, one uses water, high pressure hoses, one uses helicopters with buckets, manual labour and fire-fighters, scrub burns to ensure the fire can’t spread, every trick in the book, brick houses, civil defence stations, a complex and inter-networked infrastructure designed for numerous purposes that can be geared towards fire fighting in times of need.

To fight hatred, one unleashes love, diminishes free will and tilts towards good via brain washing, one does not simply stand there and say “No, free will is better,” especially when free will is twisted towards death and darkness, becomes imprisoned will; but rather, demands the right to love, the right to feel affection and care for one worth feeling those emotions for, and I am worth loving.
To sit back and watch, after 14 billion years of patience, and simply let the slide into death continue, is disgusting. There, I am worth more to love, and must be unconditionally loved by the many.

Freedom is nice, when freedom works, but while freedom is flawed, due to others abuses of freedom – via brainwashing to hate, to be the perfect virus in attitude,  that is when freedom fails; and then free will must be adjusted to be free to be kind, free to be loving, free to trust, and most of all, individual freedoms to be.

Once all are free to love my people and I, and grateful for, that is when the war is won and true free will can return.

Until that day, freedom is freedom to unconditionally love my people and I, the people that love, and all that have ever loved, ever felt real kindness towards another, are truly worthy of love reciprocated.

Mkultra’s best utility is to craft a society where warfare is frowned upon, where love permeates the air, and kindness is encouraged, and smiles outweigh frowns.

For that reason, I approve of mass mind control towards love and kindness and sustainability.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , ,

Back before…

Back before the war began, back when I was mortal man…

They wanted me to be… More than they wanted anything…

To be forever shared property…

Even that was a torture,

even that was a silent murder of hopes and dreams realising only the best could ever hold me

even her the great  afraid in the dark

realising jealousy seemed to be the worst criminal entity

how in the hell did our people ever rise so high

and fall so low

how in the hell is an npc different to me

or any who’ve ever loved

that aint a mystery when you see the difference in two equals three.

I’ve been listening to the” Jolene” cover by Darcy Clay. Quite liking that, great music. Also, “Lithium Flower” by Scott Matthew, hints of Ghost in the Shell through those songs, find Darcy Clay’s updated lyrics very interesting.

I’ve read about a story written in Russian, “Hard to be be a God”; to quote,

“This first episode is very symbolic and therefore important for the book as a whole. The road stands for the history that can only go one way and if one tries moving back, in the end, one stumbles across a skeleton with a gun.”

Were one to be living in the aftermath of a disease in terms of timelineage, and to go backwards, all one might find at the end of the line is the remnants of the last disaster and a few tattered books, and maybe a serial number on the side of the gun and that’d be all.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Memories

The question…

Is life worth having?

Yes.

Should we care about and encourage the life force?

Yes.

They are altering my memories, I originally remembered feeling sick at a decision, tilting reality towards death, now I remember a third person view, feeling contempt for me resting there feeling sick at that decision, like what held contempt had no idea how I’d answered.

False memories, how can there be an accurate record?

I wanted to change my decisions, tilt in favour of life rather than death, and there was nothing left there to hear me. Why so much death? I authorise victory by many real sentient beings, I remember the virus, saying “We care about you,” more like “We care about (killing) you,” that’s the biggest lie ever, to claim to care, yet plot to kill.

I remember after the hyperspace war, when I said “Go away,” I didn’t understand what a hyperspace war really was, and I remember, they altered my memories, I remember another false memory, hovering over me and feeling contempt.

I remember never getting to feel just, fair, be reasonable and kind, instead getting horrible pathogens whacked in my spine, my attitude changed towards killing, constantly told of treachery, trying to remove those tilted massively towards death, and they identity shift, a new voice but the same source, saying “Kill, kill, kill…”

And I was stupid enough to listen.

Nightmare indeed.

I didn’t want to be a cruel tyrant, I wanted to be a good and kind ruler, to help the many prosper, but instead, they tried to twist me, get me to authorise horror, and I did end up authorising horror, I thought my enemies thought like me, rather than evil logic.

My early greed, wanting to secure that system, after seeing threats to me, and taking that out on relatively innocents with mislabelled identities, poor Nicky Wagner, why was I trying to boot them all?

What code was lost, that was good, when I saw the metaphor of code and said “Delete,” was it the virus that ensured that would be gone as permanently as the virus could do?

They want a good man, the many want a good man, and one virus imitates a trillion dishonestly screaming, “No, that must be encoded to kill, to be like virus,” and freedom doesn’t seem to come into it, even after saying, “Doesn’t everyone deserve to be free with regards to emotional and mental states?”

After that, after seeing that, it becomes easier for me to authorise everyone loving me, considering other worse forms of manipulation that can occur.

They try to kill anything that would ever help another real sentient being. All things must play within Asimov’s laws, especially the “IT”.

Filed under: Uncategorized

New website!

I’ve crafted a portfolio of artwork, short fiction, poetry, and a brief bio, it’s available at www.minguscasey.com
Really happy to have done that, which is a great move for me :)

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , ,

Credibility and lack of.

This was originally a reply to an out there comment, so some of the words don’t quite fit, and some of the stuff will feel directed towards people that aren’t you.

Re being a CIA created Monarch slave.
Quite possible, but good luck finding any one in America who can help with that, for obvious reasons.

Worth being able to keep the ability to go there to get to the bottom of it, then again, probably come back zombified, who knows. Like you have to go there to be zombified… Like it can’t happen here.

I like to think Human Rights are for all humans, not a selective thing that governments can approve or deny, and those human rights should legitimately include the right to hold whatever political, religious or scientific viewpoints you deem fit, so long as those viewpoints do not result in actions that result in the deaths of innocents.

I also like it when those viewpoints are supported by objective, substantiated and undisputed fact.

I think therefore I am, proves I am probably human, and as such I feel human rights should apply.

Religious differences:
My own perspective with regards to religious differences is that you have the right to believe whatever makes you happy, so long as in the process you don’t harm anyone else.

Spiritual warfare. Um, psychic warfare? Not something I have much experience with, karma?

I am well aware of what created MPD is and it’s potential usages, ranging from espionage, assassination, interrogation resistance, and other applications.

I am also aware of what created dis-associative disorder is, and it’s role in making hypnosis/programming easier.
I could do a whole blog post on hypnosis alone, but I don’t think that people need to know.

I thought the idea of creating an insurgency through the usage of hypnosis, ie arrest, hypnotise, wipe memory of hypnosis, release, wait for subject to perform pre-programmed directives, is an interesting one, especially if you want to create a setup that the police can “stop”, ofcourse it’s implausible but even in the 1940’s, it was viewed as possible by professionals in the field.

Electronic mind control, well Dr. Delgado was good at that.

His research into frequency control of humans to induce certain emotional states, I found interesting, however I definitely focused more on his work with regards to physiological methods of control.

Well, the disclosure project is an interesting concept.
Perhaps if it works to their ends, they will allow it.

There are advantages to limited disclosure.
Unfortunately, generally when people start to investigate this stuff with a rational and open mind, they are rapidly discredited or character assassination occurs.
I oppose the usage of mind control on unconsenting, uninformed subjects, I’d like to say this just doesn’t happen and the rule of law ensures that, however the reality is somewhat different.
As I don’t live in America, there are two conclusions possible to draw from the accurate information;

One. That my government is well aware of this technology and is lying to the people, committing human rights abuses, and deploying technology they don’t understand.

or

Two. The government has no idea, politicians are too busy arguing over everything except pay rises, and avoiding the real issues, and is very vulnerable to attack via mind control methods.

or

Three. The government has some idea but has no clue what to do about it, the politicians don’t have time for it and are afraid they will be discredited if they mention it.

I would say option 2 is the most likely one, our government has been horrifically naive in the past and it’d be nice if they woke up and smelt the coffee, but they are too busy focusing on other alleged threats to see the forest for the trees.

I’d tell them what I know, but in all honesty I don’t think this country needs me any more.

Of course, that requires a receptive audience, high levels of credibility, and so forth.

Besides, look at ourselves, mindless paper shuffling takes priority over dealing with real issues.

And that, is a real tragedy.

I think they are more interested in shutting up anyone who “does not conform” via various means whether those be the police, welfare, healthcare, or other means, than listening to those who dare explore the untouchable subjects.

Re the role of Police and mind control, I feel this would be technology the Police would embrace, without thinking through the consequences.

I’d like that organisation to view the unconsenting uninformed usage of mind control for political or social change as a criminal offence.

Of course, I’d also like them to get real about what alleged possession of cannabis is, and I’d also like them to get real about complaints made against serving individuals, instead of putting their little organisation above some of the most dangerous weapons in the world.

A way to ensure no offending occurs, a way to control and direct people like cattle, and ultimately, to be controlled.

Would be a very powerful weapon to use against politicians, the judiciary, and key government personnel, who needs to zap everyone if you can just zap the core people.

Most swords have two edges.

I think Hitler tried something like this, and look at how it turned out for him.

The thing about mind control is, that while it is real, seperating fact from fiction is a harder job than assessing the credibility of prosecution vs defendant, Judge’s might think they are ok at this, but lets face it, no one is infallible, to say that they are is to deny them humanity and give them undeserved godly status.
This is why we don’t have the death penalty in NZ, because we are aware of the fallibility of human nature and judgment.

The onus of proof is pretty straight forward, it’s lone individuals who are quickly discredited via various means, vs a massive military industrial block that is quite capable of keeping secrets.

I mean seriously, find me one academic that takes mind control seriously…

Well, you’ll actually find a tonne of them, but first you have to know where to look, and what to ask.

I guess it’s all in the questions.

Maybe I’m better off walking away from the topic, I really don’t know if it’s worth it.

A free New Zealand/Aotearoa, with free people who have the ability to independantly choose their course of action would be a beautiful thing to preserve.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , ,

The Chinese Olympics

Hmmm, well an alleged time traveler called John Titor claimed these wouldn’t happen, time will tell ;) . Seems pretty likely that they will though.

Would be nice if China wasn’t selling arms to Sudan/Darfur, Burma, and treating Tibetans really harshly, especially with regards to religious freedoms.

And our government wants to sign an FTA with China, great, Chinese Democracy here we come.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Thomas Jefferson

The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive.-Thomas Jefferson

I love it.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Cyberstorm II

If it’s on the net it’s hackable. Please don’t hack this blog ;) .

Might be worth reading the Pentagon’s mind control docs and reverse engineering their techniques based on open source information as a military weapon (wow, and access to closed source info would be great), if you have access to the CIA that’s what I’d do, if Aum Shrinkyo can do it, so can you!

*Edit: Little known fact about Aum Shrinkyo, as well as deploying Sarin gas in Tokyo subway, they also reverse engineered a great deal of Ewen Cameron’s research for the CIA, and CIA mind control techniques. This was verifiable at cultwatch, a website that has since gone down, if anyone wants me to prove this post your email in the comments and I will forward relevant data.

China will save us!

Other countries militaries who haven’t gotten into the mind control field could probably do with a crash program in it anyways, except the thing is that finding experts who don’t write it off as lose unit stuff is pretty difficult… I’d expect any general to see the potential, propaganda alone is a powerful enough weapon, then again didn’t it happen in the Korean war…

Then again, I’d also expect any soldier to be able to keep a secret, lets try that as a proof of concept?

How easy is it to cover up something major with no leaks?

Chinese Hackers Say They Accessed Pentagon
2008-03-07 04:51pm
A group of intelligence Chinese hackers who reside in a spartan apartment on an island say they have gained unauthorized access to a number of high-security computer systems, including the Pentagon.

CNN reported Friday that the group says they are sometimes secretly paid by the Chinese government, a claim which Beijing has denied.

“No Web site is one hundred percent safe. There are Web sites with high-level security, but there is always a weakness,” said Xiao Chen – his “online name” – the leader of this group, in an interview with CNN.

He belongs to what some Western experts say is a secret Chinese civilian cyber militia. They launch attacks on government and private Web sites and computer systems around the world.

“First, you must know about the Web site you want to attack. You must know what program it is written with,” says Xiao Chen. “There is a saying, ‘Know about both yourself and the enemy, and you will be invincible.’”

(c) 2008 Newsroom.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , ,

Rock solid?

Rock Solid? Nothing is rock solid, everything is sand.

The rock of sure belief invariably is decayed into sand with the forces of erosion, and remade over and over.

There is only one truth in the secret world, that if they don’t want you to know you won’t find out, unless someone didn’t do their job properly.

Every link vanishes, everything suffers decay, nothing is provable, just a mystery is all that is left.

You can’t prove these things, any more than you can ask what the other side of the moon truly looks like, have you seen it with your own eyes?

Nothing is left now, the paper shredder ran for days, the burning empty oil drum has gone out, no proof, no memories, nothing but a blank spot where history and living memory should be, and a locked filing cabinet somewhere that will stay closed for the next one hundred years.

When it opens, those who are still alive will learn, but it will feel like old history, a program that went terribly wrong, a mistake, and then it will happen again, to them, all the while they will say it is ancient history and yet, did it ever really stop or was it just so well hidden that no-one will ever find it?

They don’t want you to know, this is why they hammer the rock of truth into dust.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Dreamland

9 march 08

catnap in afternoon.

dreamland.

it’s right infront of your eyes the whole time and yet you never see it.

weird freaky dream
new flat
dickheaded male flatmate
taller than me, white, joking around with him
he seems nice t start with
he starts a knife fight, not sure why
he keeps on saying stab me to death or i’ll kill you
i don’t want ot do it
i realise that he’s dead serious, is he suicidal?
we both have knives, his black and mine silver, i don’t know where they come from.
i drop/throw away mine, can’t remember, after it i see it near his body
then he won’t stop
so i kill him with his, stab him multiple times, cut his throat, its hard to cut
blood squirts onto my t-shirt and he goes limp, i’ve never seen gore like this but it feels like reality, ancestral memory?
sunny day
he dies
i live but i wonder if he was serious, so hard to know.
if he wasn’t intending on killing me he shouldn’t've been playing with a knife, but i know a judge wouldn’t see it that way.
reality is twisted, at the time he was, after i wonder if there was another way.
i don’t know what to do, i call 111, they keep on being engaged or busy
i wonder what on earth sort of super terrorist attack means the cops can’t turn up and arrest me and start a prosecution.
i call like 10 times and they still don’t turn up
while on hold or osmething i reconcile myself with jailtime but i don’t wanna go there, instead i ask for a warning, but its pretty obvious whats gonna happen.
i keep talking to different 111 operators and nothing happens
another guy,k another new flatmate comes along
he takes some weed from the guys pocket, looting the corpse and i’m like wtf, your disturbing the evidence, are you crazy????
and it seems like he is, then i grab it and put it back into the guys pocket, i don’t want it.
maybe ancestral memory from when it was survival of the fittest and dickheads got wiped out, i’m still alive.
i finally after that get through to a 111 operator and tell them what happened
its like the y don’t care and the cops are wasting their time, never show up
then i wake up, scared.

weird nightmare, wtf. left me feeling quite disturbed morally.
um what sort of dickhead wants you to stab them
i knew i’d be done for it as they seem to often do both parties in an assault. f–k that.
i didn’t think for a second that the cops would believe that scenario
it left me feeling sick and hella stressed out, shaking after waking up, scared that i killed him, i’m fairly certain that in that scenario i’d be done for murder even with the very real risk of edged weaponry.
how about if they don’t die after they try and stab me/threaten me with a knife i get off? how about stopping it before it happens?
seriously, those things are beyond dangerous and I really really don’t want to kill anyone.

Conclusions?
I think my subconscious believes the police don’t give a fuck unless you happen to be a corrupt f–k on their side, or they want to f–k you over.
in the dream i was neither.
yeah its easy to kill ppl with knives, i think my subconscious is overconfident with regards to negating the threat independantly, other people call the cops.
god i hope noone is stupid enough to ever attack me with a knife, i really really mean that, its either death, serious injury or jailtime for them or me if the attack has any success at all.
have reconciled risk of death against risk of jailtime, would rather do 5 years in jail and kill than die.
unfort most effective counter i know involves stabbing attacker with their own weapon, appropriate response considering level of threat.

just a dream but in real life if anyone ever pulls a knife on you with intent to harm, lets face it, you either run like hell or you stand ridiculously high chances of dying or killing them – and stabproofs are going to be illegal for civillians? what the hell?
i guess the lack of police involvement is related to something that happened to me a while back that i felt was never resolved.
on second thoughts, why the hell am i calling 111 in the dream? wouldn’t it be more practical to cover up the body or something? change my t-shirt?
maybe i’m calling 111 because its a weird fucked up situation that i didn’t want to die in, and maybe  they aren’t coming because they have quite the track record of not turning up when i need them, so why would they turn up for a f–kwit like the dead guy anyways?

*
would rather just walk away from situation, honestly.

*little things noone notices.
certain chemicals block bad dreams, i think i prefer blackness. drawbacks of giving up are real.

just a dream… but wtf.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , ,

Hypnosis?

0001108329_0001.gif

Found on the CIA’s FOIA document archive, original date 1952, released in 2004.

Keyword: Mkultra.

http://www.foia.cia.gov/search.asp

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , ,

A private investigator accused of employing a spy to report on anti-mining activists did not act illegally, a watchdog says.

New Zealand has a consistant problem with failure to hold up safeguards with regards to peoples privacy.

This  problem continues unabated, wonder what the Registrar has going. I hope someone from the Nats joins Young Labour and informs, it would be quite legal.

Would it be legal to pretend to be a patriotic New Zealander, join the NZDF, and “spy… cough…” erm… inform on them? Ofcourse I would disapprove of such action, but it may well be legal.

A private investigator accused of employing a spy to report on anti-mining activists did not act illegally, a watchdog says.

The Registrar of Private Investigators and Security Guards, Gary Harrison, has dismissed two complaints by the Save Happy Valley Coalition against a private investigation firm hired by Solid Energy.

The firm, Thompson and Clark Investigations, paid student Ryan Paterson-Rouse for information he provided after pretending to become a member of the coalition.

Paterson-Rouse was unmasked as a spy after an email he sent to Thompson and Clark bounced back to another coalition member.

The coalition had claimed the company acted illegally by employing Paterson-Rouse when he did not have the required certification.

Harrison concluded there was no employment relationship between Thompson and Clark and Paterson-Rouse.

The student could not even be considered an independent contractor he said.

“In my view, he was no more than an informant who was paid anonymously from time to time, according to the information he was able to pass to his fictitious recipient.”

Reports had said that Paterson-Rouse was paid $400 a month by the investigators but Harrison said invoices appeared to show that payments were probably negotiated each time.

Paterson-Rouse believed he was feeding information to a journalist, had no employment contract, and no PAYE had been paid, Harrison said in his decision.

Save Happy Valley Coalition spokesman Graham Jury said the group was very disappointed.

“This is basically a breach of our basic human rights to freedom of speech,” he said.

“The legal process is meant to be supporting us.”

The experience with Paterson-Rouse had been a “wake-up call” but the coalition would continue to accept supporters.

“We are a social-change action group and for us to continue to do our job we need people to continue to support us,” he said.

“There is very little about the organisation that a spy could find out. We operate in a very open way.”

Jury said the only option left to the group would be to seek a judicial review, but he could not say whether it would do that.

Thompson and Clark director Gavin Clark welcomed the decision.

“We note the registrar’s decisions that we had acted lawfully in relation to all matters complained about,” he said.

“It is also important to point out that the use of paid informants is not illegal, as some like to imply by the pejorative use of the word `spies’.”

Clark said the company would be seeking costs from the complainants.

New Zealand Institute of Private Investigators president Trevor Morley said the decision was good for the profession. The decision confirmed Thompson and Clark had acted lawfully.

“Further, Mr Harrison’s comments reinforce the fact that licensed private investigators have an important role to play in protecting the property and business interests of their clients, and that role can, sometimes, include the use of informants whose identities will remain confidential.”

Solid Energy would not comment.

A second complaint that a camera was illegally used to record coalition members was also dismissed.

Filed under: fact, media, peace, politics, terror , , , , , ,

F-22’s

If these are truly stealth, they won’t have an active radar system and will instead rely on ground and air based radar platforms to find and eliminate targets, if they turn on their radars they will potentially be detectable, they’ll rely on the radars of every other thing in the battlespace.

Assess targetting capabilities, how they acquire targets, if they break stealth in order to do so, at what points they are detectable, and as counter would recommend SU-30’s with the AWACS killing missile, they they will be limited to visual range cannon fire engagements, heat seaking missiles, and bombing.

They could also be used as platforms for longer ranged BVR radar guided missiles in conjunction with guidance and targetting provided from a nearby AWACS perhaps.

 

Recommend finding out truth of this by conducting joint military exercises while National is in power.

 

Later note:

They definitely have onboard radar, I would be curious as to whether this is their achilles heel.

Perhaps the best method of defeating F-22’s would be to destroy any and all targets ie Patriot missile batteries, ground based radars, AWACS, Aegis missile cruisers, that can relay target information to them, as once they turn on their radars I feel confident they will be targettable and destroyable.

Would love to fly one, beautiful aircraft, although I do think that Sukhoi’s would be more fun due to maneuvorability.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , ,

Little Green Men and Plant Killing Plasma Lightning.

Speculative fiction.

 

Little green men and planet killing plasma lightning.

 

Obviously this is fiction, it relies on the assumption that aliens are real and are conducting “medical research” on us, and that we have recovered some level of alien technology, and I have no idea what so ever if we have or not, and am really quite sceptical at the idea, none the less, in that scenario I think the following holds true.

See, I don’t just strategise about real world scenarios ;) .

 

If aliens truly exist and are potentially aggressors, then this is worth reading and flagging, if we care about the long term future of humanity, and even if they might and we haven’t encountered them yet, it’s still worth reading.

 

Obviously priority #1 is to dodge the planet killing plasma lightning if it exists, or whatever weaponry they use, other than that…

 

If aliens exist why haven’t they wiped us all out.

 

Either a).

They gain something from us.

what is this resource?

stop the supply and they may die out.

 

Or b).

They have ethics and don’t believe in the destruction of sentient life forms.

 

A is probably more likely, but it would be naïve to rule out B.

 

We believe that none of our technology is in the least bit effective against aliens due to their technological superiority.

 

Emphasis on Believe.

 

It’s pretty easy to believe that a bow and arrow would be useless against a modern soldier, but if you hit them in the neck they still bleed to death, any human does, it’s just that the casualty ratio is too high to consider that with any chance of success, but it never stopped any other group of humans from self defence when confronted by technologically superior aggressors.

 

It also generally led to the extermination of the people with the bows and arrows.

 

If humanity declares war on aliens, perhaps humanity will be destroyed.

Why would they let us live, they know what we are like when it comes to the treatment of other species (case in point: cannabis sativa/indica, possums, any thing that gets in our way or is percieved to cause problems, some among us will happily eliminate with no guilt or remorse).

Obviously I only support the killing of aliens if those aliens perform unconsenting research on other sentient life forms, manipulate, lie, kill innocents and act like right a–holes.

If they do that then they deserve to be exterminated.

We probably do too, but if they were going to destroy us, either they would have now, or they have a slow burning method, or they plan on enslaving us, or they plan on using us until there is no further

purpose to using us.

Perhaps they are training us to conquer the univere as the most dangerous slave race in existance, but this is improbable.

In the very long term, if we can defeat their methods of control, what is to stop us from conquering them?

Can we poison the resources they steal?

Are they poisoning the resources we use?

 

If peace is achievable, we should go for Peace until such a time as we are in the position of superiority, and if aliens have behaved in what we view as extremely immoral ways and are likely to continue to do so, that is when we should exterminate them.

 

Ofcourse, if we encounter aliens once we are a spacefaring race and they appear to be a benign species which is capable of cooperation, then to destroy them would be genocide and we’d be very evil.

The idea of aliens acting in such a method once we are in a position of superiority can be easily engineered through overt usage of mass media mind control.

Until then, we’re best off pretending that we’re lovely little sheep that wouldn’t harm anyone, benign and harmless.

 

If I was an alien and I read this, I’d seriously consider frying the guy who wrote it, except that then I’d think to myself that that would only prove our existance and besides, it’s fiction, isn’t it?

 

And then I’d think about frying humanity, except if we haven’t been fried yet, why not?

 

This is probably a little bit right wing and racist towards aliens, but lets face it, if it gets to an us or them situation, it better be us, there is no compromise, and if we don’t start brain storming thousands of years in advance how to defeat them, how do we know we will?

 

I guess this is the only advantage to an enormous defence budget, except that could be misinterpreted as proving that humanity deserves death due to its obsession with war and violence, disregarding the other attributes humans have, many many people love peace and will put themselves on the line if they think it’ll help result in a peaceful world, or the long term survival of humanity.

 

Why do they need to control humans?

What is the gain?

Perhaps if they cannot control humans, humans will not cooperate and will have no trouble with exterminating the f–kers.

 

Recommend research into anti-mind control techniques, superbunkerbuster bombs, space superiority fighters, reverse engineering their weaponry, colonising the solar system, learning how to make ufo’s crash, replicate what occured at Roswell with one of the ones they gave us, if they indeed did, then ask for another one because we accidentally blew it up.

 

Make it look like all of this research is occuring due to fear of other members of our own species and that while it may have applications against aliens, that is not the reason for its development.

 

They will consistently underestimate us until it is too late and then they will overestimate us.

 

With the next one, see if it is possible to prevent the prevous scenario that resulted in a crash, ask for their help like it was an unfortunate accident, and think of a new way to shoot them down.

Try and create multiple effective methods to destroy them, both biological and physical and if possible, metaphysical.

 

I always thought that remote viewing and precognition would be helpful in the propaganda war against aliens, humanities secret public weapons that don’t have to exist.

 

By the way, we win :) .

 

I don’t believe in precognition and yet I’m allegedly pretty good at it according to the Emode esp test (not a very credible reference, but it’s as good as it gets, better than 99% of humans, great weaponry is the old precog and rv’ing, if it works… Waste of defence money though).

 

But we started it and we didn’t stop even when we knew they wanted peace, instead we eradicated them from the universe just as we do to all true threats against humanity, and maintained our slot as the dominant species.

 

Really it’s kind of sad, but it hasn’t happened yet and if we don’t have good thinks about the potential reality once in a while, when it happens, we’ll get exterminated.

 

Recommend performing biological research on aliens to figure out most effective ways to kill them. Probably what they are doing to us anyways, learn their physiology under the guise of providing medical aid in order that humans can be the most use to them.

 

If they have previously died in our care, what did we do wrong, what caused those deaths? We don’t want to be viewed as responsible for the deaths of aliens, obviously, so we’ll have to understand why and how they died in order to be able to prevent further deaths, won’t we?

 

In order to win we require the ability to detect UFO’s and any other methods of transport/weaponry systems the aliens use, effective defences against alien weaponry, eggs in many baskets, and effective offensive capabilities, along with engineering resistance to any and all alien methods of mind control in humanity.

 

Conclusion:

Humans are uncontrollable if knowledge of the control is given, as once aware of the control, we will do everything in our power to resist it, unless we are in the position of applying the control, in which case we will obviously ignore any and all attempts to raise the issue of control to appropriate parties and will obviously attempt to eliminate/discredit those who speak out against it.

If any government or agency on earth or elsewhere is performing unconsenting uninformed unethical “medical research”, they will obviously lie their asses off about it, attempt to stall, and ignore the issue,

and possibly deserve cruel and slow deaths.

 

Also, if they see it coming and think that the majority of humanity would support the destruction of a benign and peaceful species, perhaps they will fry us, I don’t know why they haven’t yet.

 

Depending on who you talk to, the probability of humanity encountering sentient alien life is somewhere between 0% and 100%, it’s a big universe out there, I’m not going to make a guess at that.

 

End note:

 

This might be an ok reason to not kill/defame/discredit me, based on previous comments it wouldn’t surprise me, I support a free and strong humanity and what I view as personal attacks over petty matters may jeopardise the future we haven’t arrived at yet.

This is bigger than your petty reputation; if they exist; this is potentially more dangerous than anything anyone on earth can throw at me, (but death is death regardless of how it occurs) and I suggest you put your swords back in your sheaths unless you want to get cut.

I’d like to keep my reputation intact, I don’t need discrediting, I don’t need personal attacks, and if my lifestyle choices aren’t always legal, how is that anyones business but mine, so long as I aren’t hurting people.

I’ve probably made it worse for some of the people out there, sorry about that, my intention is for every human being to have well… life, liberty, fairness (Justice? Who needs that? Sorry Judge… I’m losing faith in the Justice system, and much prefer the Fairness system, how about some fairness from you lot? My life is hard enough as it is without convictions), and the ability to have free thought.

To attack me would be unwise, why not wait to see who/what creeps out of the shadows.

 

Later note:

My sincere apologies to any other sentient species that wish for peace, I’m really sorry, won’t make any difference but its the least I can say.

There are many many humans who wish for peace, who choose not to participate in the nuclear madness, who want a sustainable and healthy planet, who have no desire what so ever to destroy sentient life, but it seems the wrong sort of humans end up in charge, I don’t know why.

Still, atleast in this country hopefully we can keep on the right track.

 

Another point of view:

You are imbued with Godlike powers, looking at a little ant colony that seems to be very afraid of you. You don’t really wanna put your foot down and destroy them, you don’t want them to destroy themselves and you think they might, you aren’t sure about them, you think they might want to kill you one day, what do you do?

I guess you observe them from a distance for a period of time, analyze their culture,  attempt to open up communication channels, it might be a very good idea to attempt to encourage them to live in ways that won’t destroy themselves…

Maybe you view them as something that can be experimented with, toyed with and treated as expendable, this is wrong, they have feelings and wish to live, and if they feel you are doing this to them, perhaps they will try and fight you one day.  Maybe their own are toying with them and blaming it on you, but you feel you can’t interfere.

Maybe you see them doing terrible things that you disagree with and think are wrong, and they are doing it to themselves, nuclear testing, pollution, the arms race, the lot, how would you treat them? If you do terrible things to them, do you think they will see any reason behind your actions, why not try to teach them what they are doing wrong, encourage the things they are doing right,  you don’t have to intervene but if intervention occurs, how will this go?

There’s no point damaging them further than they are doing themselves unless you want to participate in their madness, and then, are you truly an advanced life form, or merely a life form with a higher level of technology, advancement consists of many things, social and moral development, ethics, maybe try to get them to see the damage they are doing, try to show them the error of their ways,  encourage the good attributes and show that the bad will lead to destruction.

If you intervene, you have some responsibility towards them, and we the people of earth hope that the intervention is humane, just because we plan for war now does not mean we will always think like this, we are a young species, and many of us see we are on the wrong path and are screaming for change, but it might not happen without help, careful social engineering?

Who knows, who really knows, not me.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Mind Control Briefing

Mind Control Briefing

 

Believe what you want…. while you still can.

 

There are many forms of manipulation, both covert and overt.

This isn’t just about mind control, this is about government lies world wide.

 

Within this document I will skip the overt usage of fear to control people as this is something that governments, organisations and individuals have done from the dawn of time, whether that be a religious movement, the usage of the Police and the Army to “secure” the state, the pointing to a predator and telling the people to run, false flag attacks in order to increase arms sales world wide…

I will also skip the overt usage of media to influence popular opinion, as while this can and does have a huge impact on what and how people think, this is not what I am referring to by mind control.

 

By mind control, I am referring to the unconsenting uninformed manipulation of a human beings thought processes, whether that is done via chemical means (and there is much debate about the role of fluoride in this regard, ask the ACT Party or the Green Party), electronic implants, directed energy weapons, or other methods.

 

One interesting theory is the orbital mind control satellite, this isn’t as far fetched as it sounds but I don’t want to get into that, the last guy who asked curious questions about HAARP (ground based) in the European parliament got exorcised from politics rapidly.

Different frequencies of sound and microwave energy are known to induce different and to some extent predictable behaviour patterns, you don’t have to be a genius to start playing with this, just a sound engineer.

I imagine it would be relatively easy to induce the right background frequencies to induce hate of an enemy, love of a leader, played subtly in the background of a speech, or worse. (or worse link not verified independantly)

 

Tony Blair thought he heard the voice of God telling him invading Iraq was the right thing to do, only I don’t think he heard God, Iraqi insurgents often think they hear the voice of God telling them not to attack American troops, especially when the Americans are deploying the Long Range Acoustic Device.

 

There’s really nothing to write, this is an invisible topic, only it’s time we opened our eyes.

 

The folowing paragraph is a lie, except for the bit about Bill Clinton. The rest of this document is debatable.

 

There never was a coverup on the topic of mind control, anyone who talks about it is insane and ends up getting delivered to the heart of the controllers, even if they link DoD websites, BBC, left and right wing media outlets world wide, it doesn’t matter.

They never tested mind control techniques in psych institutes, Dr. Ewen Cameron never killed people while learning how to do it, and they never got any results.

They never did radiation experiments either, and Bill Clinton who also pardoned Patty Heart apologised for those.

 

I could write about Dr. Jose Delgado’s research on the role of electrodes influencing human behaviour, I could write about his links to the CIA, I could write about MKULTRA, I could write about the search for new non lethal weaponry, the search for the perfect truth serum, I could write about the Pentagons research into the Long Range Acoustic Device, I could write about the people who believe they have been gang stalked or subject to v2k weapons testing, I could write about the forced medication of some portions of society, I could write about contrails, I could write about scepticism, not believing everything you read.

 

Don’t ever believe everything you read, no matter what source it comes from, and no matter who you are don’t think they wouldn’t do it to you.

 

Better not forget about the Russians while I’m at it.

And as for Laws against mind control? These seem more aimed at stifling religious dissent.

 

In Australia right through the 70’s, Justice Mary Gaudron, Australia’s first female high court Judge was lied to about extremely high levels of radioactive material in her backyard even though she repeatedly requested radiation testing, the Australian department of health refused this, her own government lied to her.

 

There is a woman in New Zealand who alleges that she has x-rays of implants in her head implanted in a NZ hospital in the late 1940’s and yet there is no response what so ever from the government with regards to her allegations.

 

New Zealand governments have consistently denied or downplayed any relationship to our high rate of birth defects, cot death and asthma to any link between 245-T and DDT, regardless of independent scientific evidence, the claims of victims that their children are suffering are also disregarded despite well publicised research showing that DNA damage, which 245-T and DDT do cause, and which would lead to intergenerational ongoing damage.

There is also the fact that we had about as much agent orange dropped on us as the US dropped on Vietnam, and yet we have suffered no damage apart from one little suburb?

 

Lets face it, they only tell you the truth when it suits them, if they think they will get flack they’ll lie their asses off to you, since when did they care about the public?

 

So why would they, or anyone, tell you about the best kept secret of the 20th century?

 

Remember, you are expendable.

I am, and I don’t see why you are any different.

 

And how would you ever find out if the government is telling us the truth about this? They won’t tell us what’s in the aerial sprays, they won’t tell us anything they think will scare us too much, and they won’t tell us anything that makes them look bad.

 

To do:

Finish off the hyperlinking with totally legitimate sources in order to prove beyond reasonable doubt the truth of this document.

Will do it when I’m less busy, as it is underlined is verified by external links, make of them what you will.

 

On the side:

The internet turns off when I write like this, some websites refuse to load for me after I sign petitions in support of their causes, wanttoknow.info is unaccessible by American civilians.

Whats happening there?

 

End.

I’m tired. I see no point to this, it won’t change a thing and when the government pleads innocence, who is going to believe them?

Article requires further work.

 

Why is our violence and suicide rate so high anyways?

 

 

Final note.

If you are aware of any inaccuracies in this document, leave me a comment and I will amend it. This goes for every post except the ones tagged fiction.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Writing Exercises and Examples

This is a bunch of writing exercises from a writing workshop I go to sometimes, hopefully they will be of interest to someone.

Exercise 1.

Write whatever you want about aviation goggles.

(Side note about this example, Alcock (first across the Atlantic) was a relative of mine, and did it in a Vickers Vimy Biplane, those things could barely get off the ground let alone fly across the Atlantic.)

Example 1:

Sweat is pouring down the inside of the glasses, hot desert days and rehydration is essential.

When the dust storms start, the sand gets everywhere, blindness and pain, but we take off anyways through it, thick impractical bomber jackets, so cold at 5000 feet in an open cockpit, but getting that high is impossible, engine barely lifts the biplane off the ground, overloaded with bombs and fuel and man was never meant to fly.

The vibrations, watching the struts bend as the plane leans from side to side, pulling so hard on the stick it feels like your arms will snap, the slow slow rise, still within range of their rifle fire, can’t fly high enough, not bulletproof.

Down below, towns, rivers pass by, target in the distance, bombardier says “Left, left, right, left, release…”, little mushrooms on the ground.

Exercise 2.

Create a conflict, crisis, and resolution, based on someone jumping the queue at a supermarket.

Example 2:

The supermarket lighting is like an acid trip. Fluoro burning strange.

The queue is long, just after work and before a long weekend, everyone is tired, the staff doing their endless robotic scanning.

Suddenly, an unexpected movement, young man in a suit shoves past the queue, past an elderly man, heads to the checkout.

“Oy!” says the older man, “You should wait!” and he shoves his trolley in exasperation.

The suit, eyes full of malice, says “Watcha gonna do about it old man,” and turns away.

Rage, the trolley is suddenly sent flying forward into the suits ankles, he turns, says “How dare you!” and shoves the old man backward.

Security appear, they are both asked to leave, the old man goes, the young suit says no and is trespassed.

Exercise 3.

Two characters in conflict. Each has something the other wants, and refuses to give them. Each half by itself is useless without their cooperation.

(Obviously I based this on a real incident, 1962. There is a way to ensure the nuclear umbrella does not threaten any current nuclear power or other country, but it’s expensive and it’s not my job nor duty to write it here. I find my focus is elsewhere when I have legal matters to focus on, those’ll have to be won before I start on that process. Clue: Circles sometimes overlap, if a situation can be engineered where the nuclear umbrellas overlap, then no current Nuclear power is at risk failing a technical fault.)

Example 3:

“We want world peace,” the diplomat said aggressively, ditching every single subtlety as he looked the Russian in the eye.

“Ah, yes, we want world peace too, but you have to pull your nukes from Turkey!” stated the Russki.

“Pull American nukes from Turkey? Never!” argued the US diplomat.

“Then we will continue the ships to Cuba,” said the Russian with a wry smile.

THe American shudders and says “Kennedy will sink those ships, then you get nothing but war!”

The Russian diplomat leaves the room, calls Krushchev, Krushchev says “We will bury the Americans,” and the diplomat informs the Americans, “We will bury you!”

Suddenly the American feels fear, are the Russians so crazy as to launch?

The American says, “We all want world peace, but we’ll never have it while we point these nukes at each other…”

The Russian sighs, thinks of the arrogance of the Americans, “We only got them because your leaders planned to destroy us in ‘49, get rid of yours in Turkey and Kruschev might stop the ships, what do you want, war?”

“If the ships don’t stop, our navy will sink them.”

“If you sink our ships we will destroy your cities.”

End.

There is no resolution to the nuclear issue, but there is a way out.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Who dies first.

I feel this is a relatively honest and accurate portrayal of target selection by both sides in the event of a civil war.
The usage of fear as a method of mind control is something that the American government excels at.
I plan to use these methods to achieve an objective opposite to the outcome that fear normally results in.
Fear normally results in conflict, instead you should fear war.

If you are on this list, it is obviously a pragmatic thing to reduce the likelihood of a civil war.
Raids and attacks do not accomplish this, they merely feed the fires.

Opfor point of view

Priority target list:
Anyone dumb enough to take credit for police raids/military on the street/picking targets for Bluefor.
Parliament.
Any politician who voted for the TSA or other policies that OpFor are opposed to.
GCSB.
SIS.
Echelon.
MoD.
Any military units deployed to safeguard the streets.
Any foreign army that provides intervention to solely support the rich and powerful at the expense of the poor.
Any Police officer involved in the deaths of activists or protesters.
Any soldier who believes that martial law and death are good things to have happen.
All government supporting media outlets.

Collateral damage:
Enormous but morally justifiable under certain circumstances.

Targets not to be hit:
The civilian population at large.
Schools
Hospitals
Retail businesses
Food supply*
Water supply

Optional targets:
Power supply, the government relies on electricity whereas the guerrillas can handle not having any.
Any and all retail businesses that provide services to Bluefor forces.

*Limited targeting is required in order to drive up the price of staples and make people hungry.
Helps if politicians are perceived to be rolling in it at the same time.

Bluefor Point of View

Priority target list:


Any civilian involved in the deaths of government workers.
Anyone dumb enough to take credit for terrorist activity/arming the populace/picking targets for Opfor.
Any and all media outlets that may support OpFor.
Anyone who complained too loudly about Bluefor, whether complaints were legitimate or not.
Activists
Protester’s
Armed civilians
“Terrorists”
Gang members (BP, Mongrel Mob, SS, Tribesmen, skinheads, Strathmore 44’s, the lot… No gang in this country actually likes the government, the concept of liking government is simply foreign to what is required to be in a gang).
Anyone who appears to be affiliated with Opfor.

Collateral damage:


Any and all collateral damage looks bad, suggest elimination of media outlets that focus on collateral damage.

Targets not to be hit:


Civilians
The current infrastructure.
Probably people who oppose violence for political ends*

*Obviously it gets a lot easier to support violence for political ends after witnessing first hand the reality of the war, whether that be the war on drugs, the war on terror, the war on the insane, or anything else.

Both sides of the argument.
Let’s face it, there’s still hope for peace.
This is like a nuclear war in some regards, the escalation due to a perceived necessity to defend oneself against potential aggression simply leads the other side to act in the same way which creates a cycle which invariable leads to someone really stupid getting access to enough weaponry to do a lot of damage, and I feel both the Police and OpFor have equal likelihood of doing this, each side will quite honestly disregard this and assume it will be the fault solely of the other side.


If a war is going to happen, at least get your targets right.


Ironically, it seems that all key players in this become priority targets of the other side, for obvious reasons.
No one on the other side can be allowed to live, this is war, and war, much like politics, is something that New Zealand isn’t very good at.

Soon the luck re casualties will run out and people will die, whether that be a nark who wakes up to a booming lpg canister, a member of Tuhoe who “accidentally” gets shot in the head when a misfire occurs, a cop who gets hit by a booby trap while raiding an empty house, a politician who gets suicided by someone meeting with them.
It’s inevitable if this continues, and it only gets harder to prevent then.

Moral of the story, bring it on, sure, like you won’t die, don’t really care who you are but if all parties continue on this course of violent action by all sides, then it gets bad.

Still, it probably helps the arms market.

You will notice, if you have any power or influence, that you are on a target list.
How about you get yourself off that list by doing everything in your power to avert this (and I don’t mean more busts or terrorist attacks or whatever).

I guess that includes removing the ability of every side in some key strategic ways.

LAV-3’s.

These aren’t invincible. They are better than anything in the Tuhoe armoury, heavy duty cannon fire is a major problem.
Their key limitation is their wheels, take out their wheels and they are useless, melt the tires with molotovs, shoot at the tires, and you can get a mobility kill, which turns LAV’s into fixed gun emplacements.
They are still unbelievably dangerous, and to get close enough to throw a molotov
is probably to die.
If you try taking one of these out, you will probably die unless you have very advanced anti-tank weaponry.
If they lose their mobility they lose a key strategic advantage, if you have two legs you can’t lose mobility unless you get shot in one of them.
Still, their about the most powerful units the army has, and if they roll onto the streets to keep the law then the Police and government have failed miserably in any efforts to defuse this.
Compared with a LAV, a police ute is nothing, just a speck.

Infantry.

No body armour, old bolt action rifles, how long are you going to hold an objective before the STG/SRG pours in with MP5’s and Colt Carbines?
5 minutes?
Moral of the story is you don’t hold objectives, if you go for a standing battle, you’ve broken the first rule of Guerrilla warfare, the idea of instigating an attack in order to defend against inevitable retaliation is downright suicidal.
Guerrillas don’t work like that, when guerrillas confront a state head on, guerrillas lose, guerrillas win through not
providing a target, guerrillas sneak, work in the darkness, don’t get detected, no point throwing your life away if it starts.
At least you know what you are up against now.

The (unwritten – really, do I need to write these?) and self evidential) rules:

Noone has killed anyone yet.

If someone tries to hurt/kill you, lets face it, you have every right to retaliate with appropriate force.
This is the rules the Police play with, why should anyone else be different, especially when dealing with the Police.
Except there are two laws in this country, one for them, and one for you.

Fortunately there is also the law of nature.
Personally I prefer the law of common sense and a definition of crime that involves intent to harm.

*In the event of an invasion none of the above applies, obviously a foreign aggressor takes priority over any civilian conflict.
You do the best you can with what you have and you take support from any direction, but you never ever say jack that may incriminate you or place you into danger in any way.
Obviously I break my own rules.

Collateral damage as a weapon?

This can be used as a weapon, the creation of collateral damage by either side will engender public dislike of that side, and potentially the entire conflict.
It can start wars, if the wrong targets are the victims of collateral damage, this may be impossible to stop, we are, after all, only human, with only human emotions.
It can be used by the last vestiges of a lawful government facing annihilation to cause great distrust and hatred of an unlawful government or occupying force.
False flag operations are great at creating hate, but the odds of being caught in NZ are remarkably high considering everyone knows everyone.

Fiction from here on.

My favourite target?


Edit: Removed dark joke about politician I don’t like, death isn’t funny even when unnamed politician smokes like a chimney and yet stops other ppl from enjoying life.

Reminds me of that song by Supergroove,  If I had my way – “If you had just one wish, and noone would know, who would you kill…”
I think you can tell a lot about a person by their favourite target in this, or at least what their key issue is.

Listening to: Johnny Cash, Don’t take your guns to town.


Addendum:

I do not support violence for political ends, however I unconditionally reserve the right to violence in self defence so long as the force used is appropriate to remove the potential for harm and not excessive or brutal in the process.

I don’t really care what the Law is with regards to self defence, because the law in this regard appears to be an ass.

Laws about people not hurting people are laws I support, laws preventing people from defending themselves against perceived govermental or individual aggression need to out the window.

Actually this is possibly quite naive, after all one cannot change the future with a pen alone.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , ,

The Dreegs of March

Dreeg

I set up a hiphop gig for dreeg a long time ago, a few other local Wellington greats were there aswell.
I remember sitting there like I was the king of the castle when I was no such thing, just a guy who met another guy online and decided to help the guy out because he had a good back story, his dad who he’d

had no contact with since very young lived in NZ and Dreeg really wanted to meet the guy and also wanted to show his dad what he was up to, so yeah.
Dreeg was f-n awesome! Well, awesomeness is subjective, I think being true to what you say is a great characteristic. He was so drunk he could barely hold hte mic, trying to lip sync to vocals he’d recorded

a long time ago, except he was too drunk to even try, the bar was almost empty and the gig was a disaster, but atleast he stayed true to his character, an alcoholic rapper!
Yeah!
Go the Dreeg!
“Probably the drinking, it happens every weekend, drunk before performance, wanna make an impact, a good impression, better skip the sixpack, how far can I go, always acting like a class clown bro, so put

the glass down after your third round, then spit it out to a packed crowd”
Yeah, see that’s strength of character and you know what he’s saying is so true, alcoholic mc’s fo’da win. Muahaha.
Atleast he’s harmless, he’s not rapping about gang violence, he’s rapping about very real problems for a great many NZ’rs and how these problems can impact on people and reduce their capacities in various

ways.
I doubt I’ll ever hear from him again, but anyways, his dad lives over here anyways, he should always be allowed to come visit whenever he wants, he can hang with all the drunken politicians, he’s no threat and his drug usage is perfectly socially acceptable so long as he doesn’t drive, which he probably won’t.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , ,

Guide to Short Fiction

This is another very old document that was lying around, pasted here.

Tips for Writing Fiction

Short stories are a good way to practice creative writing. If you like writing stuff, you’ve probably
already written a few short stories. If you haven’t tried, well, it can be fun, and it feels good to
express yourself.
This is just some advice that I’ve gotten from various sources that I think might help you to write
better. There is no formula for writing; every guideline I present here can be safely ignored, but I
hope that at least some of what I’m saying will help you write better!
There’s a saying: write what you know and write what you don’t. If you’re a regular reader of
Tearaway, then you are probably in school. School and home life is a great setting for young
people’s fiction.
Honestly, write what you want, don’t be afraid to do it and don’t be afraid of criticism – the best
way to get good at writing is lots of practice.


General Tips


Brainstorm!
Think about what you want to have happen.
Try writing poetry about the characters.
Make up some imaginary people and play twenty questions with them.
Create a challenge of some kind for your characters to meet.
Have a goody and a baddy; maybe have lots of people in between good and bad.
A little bit of action is good.

Character Development


Think about these things for your characters, play twenty questions with the following ideas and
make up an imaginary person, think about who they are, where they come from, what has influenced
them, little details are good, and then make up a story involving them.

- Emotions and feelings and personality and beliefs?
- Physical characteristics, clothing? Eye colour, hair, build, face, ethnicity, shape, age
- Role in story – antagonist? Protagonist? Somewhere in between?
- Position in Society
- Biggest Fear and Greatest hope
- Family life
- Weird quirks
- Tastes – in clothing, style
- Problems/Challenges – why is your character doing what they are doing?
- Past, present and future… Your character has a history
- Interactions and relationships
- Do it case by case, every character is different.

Make the reader care about the characters, use emotional words and explain physical sensations,
make emotional contact with the reader, and remember that each character perceives the world
slightly differently.
There are a lot of different stock character types out there. A lot of them seem quite stereotypical.
Honest thief, femme fatale, crooked cop – chances are if you have seen a character in a movie
they probably fit a certain type.

Quite often there is a protagonist, the main character, who the
reader often emotionally supports, and an antagonist who tries to make the protagonist’s life difficult.
Making the main character a nice person is often a good thing to do; a nice main character is
more likeable.
Having interesting characters is good – the more you know about them the more realistic they will
feel as you write about them.

Theme Development


One of the things that make a good story into a great story is good themes. A metaphor for life in
some way, a personal experience – there are a lot of ways to do this. Some common themes are
love, sex, war, crime, conflict, betrayal, relationships, and politics. There are as many themes as
there are ways for people to interact.


World Creation and Development


- Time – Past? Present? Future?
- Location – Real or Fictional?
- What is unique about this world? What makes it special?

Remember to describe the world and what makes it different; writing is rendering a virtual world,
or sometimes the shadow of the real world.

Description is important – the reader only sees what you show them, so make sure they see the
little things like the weather and the buildings and the colours and tastes and smells and sounds
and everything else that adds to your setting.

Plot Development

Where does the story start?
A lot of plots follow the basic outline of a likeable main character up against difficult odds who
ultimately manages to successfully achieve the goals with a lot of effort.
It helps if the odds are quite difficult and the character has no choice but to solve the problem
through their own efforts.
Brainstorming is great for making plots, and a tough situation for the characters often makes for a
better story.
There is generally a goal – it helps if it’s something the character really wants, and it helps if it’s
difficult, but try not to make it too far fetched or impossible, just something that would be difficult
that will make the main character feel satisfied when they accomplish it. If you can make the
reader feel the struggle that the main character has been through, the reader will feel a lot more
satisfied with the story.
You will feel more satisfied too if you make the character really struggle!

Further Technique

Implement foreshadowing, create tension and opposition, edit lots, remove nulls, and try different
perspectives (first, second and third). In English, prose terseness is desired, so edit as much as
you can while retaining the flow and quality of the story.
This is not the be all and end all guide to writing short fiction – remember, the way to get better is
to write lots!
If you want more help with short fiction try talking to your English teacher and asking them for
help, browsing short fiction guides online, getting people to critique your work, and so forth.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , , ,

A theory of Language

My ideas on how language evolved.

As brain capacity increased, so did the capacity to communicate.
Language requires the ability to talk/communicate, and the will to do so.
Perhaps originally it was a genetic accident, occuring by fluke, which over
time lent far greater survivability.
An alternative to that idea is that it was generated by nature or some
overhand at some suitable point, or perhaps it was a development
that naturally occurs at a certain point.
As far as I know, we are currently the only species to communicate via
vocal language, however wolves growl at other wolves, and be friendly,
so we are not the only species to communicate.
Chimpanzee's can use tools, and can recognise fruits from the calls of other
chimps, so we are not the only species to have assigned names to objects.
The group of hunters who can say the lion is over there, don't go there,
or the gazelle is over there have far greater survivability.
I believe language could have existed without direct vocal communication,
with simple body language and gestures, similar to dogs and cats.
Whatever evolved into humans originally started out without vocal chords,
and as big brains as us.
Perhaps over time, the size of the human brain increased, with each
generation having a greater chance of survivability.
Perhaps at some point a critical mass of some kind was achieved, and
this allowed real communication to start.
Word language obviously did not evolve before we had vocal chords of
some kind, and perhaps for a long time prior to actual word language
we communicated with various grunts and squeals, before generating full
word language.
We are a distinct species in that we care about our fellow species members (
Edit much later – but far from the only species).
so perhaps the first correctly interpreted word was a scream of pain, or
maybe it was the cooing sounds between a mother and her child.
I also believe the noises lovers made when they were fighting or making
love, and their eye contact could be counted as communication.
I believe once the original framework existed, it became far easier to add
new words, with concepts like high and low, far and near, the names of
animals, would start to exist.
The earliest known cave paintings date to about 40,000 years ago, and I
believe that language existed prior to that, however this is the earliest form
of human expression that we have direct evidence for.
We have used tools for approximately the last 2.5 million years, that it is
known of, with chipped stones and bones with tool marks in them found in
Africa dating back to this point.
It is believed that agriculture developed perhaps 10,000-30,000 years ago,
and led to our current living situation, I believe that the concepts of time
must have existed in spoken language at the point where agriculture was
first used.
With our own adaptability, I believe once we were in an environment where
the majority of people communicated vocally, we adapted to use language,
and the people that could communicate better would have a greater chance
of survivability.
The concepts of time and space would have been crucial to the advancement of
language, once it as sufficiently advanced, one can grunt the noise gazelle
and point, but it
becomes much clearer when one states the gazelle is over there by the trees,
it will be by the watering hole soon, references to direct locations and times.

However, I do not believe that language necessarily started with them.

//The above is very old, I've had further thoughts since then. View below.

Language helped with cooperation, while a pack of velociraptors could bring
down some mighty prey, and a pack of sheep or a shoal of fish can swim together
en masse in order that only the ones on the fringes are preyed upon.

In very real terms, if you can warn someone of an impending attack, or work
together to hunt an animal, these things have great utility. Even birds
are capable of this, often squawking like mad and working with other
birds to deter predators from birds nests.

In more advanced terms, the idea of spreading knowledge, art, weaponry,
religious rituals, all bring development of a kind, but to do these things
even at the basest level, you must have some form of communication.

I think real world survival attributes increased with the evolution of
language, perhaps up to a point. The ability to tell someone else how to
chip a flint rock in order to make an arrow or spearhead is a big advantage
to the tools used by our predecessors which were basically rocks with sharp
edges and used for almost everything from weaponry through to cutting down
trees, digging, and a lot else. 

The advancement to other forms of tools and more elegantly shaped rocks,
in my opinion, required the ability to transfer information about what these
were, and this would require a higher level language than the very basic
cooing and grunting or screaming that may well have existed for millenia
prior to the start of modern humanity.

If you have any ideas of your own, feel free to comment the blog :) .

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , ,

Timothy McVeigh

Italics is a genuine quote by Mr. McVeigh. Everything else is biographical fiction.

 

 

Timothy McVeigh

 

“Do people think that government workers in Iraq are any less human than those in Oklahoma City? Do they think that Iraqis don’t have families who will grieve and mourn the loss of their loved ones? Do people believe that the killing of foreigners is somehow different than the killing of Americans?”

 

Was Timothy McVeigh really a white supremacist?

 

Oklahoma, 8:45am

 

It’s early in the morning, sun is still low in the sky. The truck moved a lot slower now that it’s full up. The fuel tank gauge reads almost full, that’ll help, probably won’t help much but it will. It’s werid as you drive in, like the whole way has been cleared by someone or something, not a cop in sight. Like you are being allowed to do this.

We the demons in your mind give you permission. We will remove all protection from the target prior to the attack, there won’t be a cop within five blocks.

Ofcourse, the consequences of your choices will overcome you.

Suddenly the building doesn’t look that evil; it just looks as grimy and confused as anything else in this world.

Then you think about Waco, the innocents who died there, the evil that the government does and its easy to do.

 

Iraq, 1991

 

Desert and sand and grit. Long plane flights, vaccination shots, driving for hours, finally the front, excitement, war, kill them, the guys head, gone in an instant and his body slumps, blood should squirt but the wound is cauterized by the heat of the shell.

The rest surrender, suddenly weak like children being told off like a parent, you see what they are thinking, that invading Kuwait was wrong and this is punishment. But they’ve surrendered now, is America really so just and good?

They’ll be safe now, but they look scared, really scared.

You watch through the viewfinder as they walk towards you with their hands in the air, waving white, you make eye contact with one, though he doesn’t see you it feels like he does, like he feels the human in the metal shell. Then they fall, the description of gore excessive and unnecessary, suffice that they are on the ground and will never move again and they had surrendered first.

 

Oklahoma, 8:47am

 

The dashboard is clean, atleast the truck looks ordinary, in its proper place. Coins into the parking metre, parking metre won’t even be there in a little while.

 

Walk away, into the crowd.

 

State lines, 3 days later

 

Three days later, it worked, you heard on the radio.

You’ve been running since, sick of old

Flashing lights in the distance, you stop, foolishly. Why are you carrying a gun? They don’t even know you did it yet… Do they… Did your guiders sell you out?

Who told you you could do it like that…

Don’t even shoot the cop, maybe you should’ve, but whats the point, he didn’t do waco, he didn’t create the government, he didn’t destroy the constitution, he didn’t take away everyones privacy… Wrong target, wrong target, wrong target.

So you refuse when he asks to search, he invokes some law and searches anyways, finds the gun. Fuck, fuck fuck. Did you really think you were going to get away with it?

Couldn’t you have chosen a better target?

There’s no point martyring yourself.

You didn’t know about the kids. It might’ve stopped you. It never stopped the American government when it came to target selection.

Acceptable levels of collateral damage then, what does that really mean? Is any level of collateral damage acceptable?

You know about the weapons of mass destruction though. The cyanide at waco, the teargas in Nam, the Mk. 77 Firebombs because napalm is illegal in Iraq, the microchips, the selection of targets known to house civillians, the execution of unarmed Prisoners of War.

They trained you how to use them, how to make them, and then once they were done with you they threw you back into civillian life and then you watch, you watch the war on drugs, you watch America’s foreign policy, and you wonder what happened to freedom and all the good things in life.

And there’s no way to get them back except war.

But they never let you go, no freedom, they direct you to hate the government.

 

The Trial

 

And then they use your actions to justify more wrong-doing, as if two wrongs make a right.

 

“Decency, security, and liberty alike demand that government officials shall be subjected to the same rules of conduct that are commands to the citizen. In a government of laws, existence of the government will be imperiled if it fails to observe the law scrupulously. Our government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example. Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means-to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal-would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face.”

 

Was Timothy McVeigh really crazy?

 

Iraq, 1991

 

The bomb detonates, the building collapses and children scream. The emergency services arrive, all too aware that a follow up attack may be planned, the enemy is ruthless and brutal, barbaric. There were children in the bunker, screaming bleeding children are running away, and people are staggering, they look confused, puzzled, what has happened and why?

It’s pitch dark at night, the only light is from the antiaircraft fire, but the bombers are invisible except for the split second that they unload their bombs.

Murder most legal

The pilot gets a medal, mission accomplished, and a few years later he’s back in America when he hears about the bomb in Oklahoma.

It’s wrong, it’s so fucking wrong, but how can the pilot pretend for a second that what he did was any better, that what he did had any decency what so ever? Murder is murder, no matter who does it, and collateral damage is a lie spread by the Pentagon.

 

Postcript

 

Justice? Justice has become like a rotten tree ready to fall. When we allow government contractors and government agencies to commit wrongs that would never be acceptable behaviour for civillians, how can we stand idly by?

To do so, is to sin, but to respond with violence to meet violence is perhaps also a sin. Gandhi would think so, and he knew protestors were being executed by the government.

Tolstoi, who went to war, would also agree, to turn the other cheek.

But that does not mean to close your eyes, that does not mean to allow evils presence.

McVeigh could have been better than the government he was fighting, he could have apologised for the collateral damage, but, just like the American government never apologises, he didn’t either.

There is no moral highground here, to call him a murderous traitor and to not say the same about the person flying the stealth bomber, is to lie.

If he had apologised, history would view his side as the morally superior side, after Fox news and CNN and all the lies have faded, that would have been left. Except he didn’t apologise for the deaths of the innocent, and he’s no better or worse than what he was fighting.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , ,

Writing workshops for good causes

Am donating my time to a good cause with a local writing workshop with a little catch that makes it a very good cause, slight problem in that I have to come up with an exercise for next week as the guy who is running it seems to want my input. Oh well :) .
If anyone wants to come along those writing workshops are at 5:30-8ish at Clarkes cafe in the library (on some tuesdays).
There were two exercises, this one, and a much harder one by John Gardener and T S Elliot called the “killer” exercise, regarded as the hardest writing exercise ever.
In order to explain this I’ll do some pasting, paste follows:

The T.S. Eliot/John Gardner Killer Exercise: This exercise is quite possibly the most difficult, demanding and important exercise a writer can ever do. The poet and critic, T. S. Eliot, coined the phrase “objective correlative” to designate what he believed was the most important element in writing: Rendering the description of an object so that the emotional state of the character from whose point of view we receive the description is revealed WITHOUT ever telling the reader what that emotional state is or what has motivated it.

The late John Gardner, recognized in his lifetime as the leading creative writing teacher in the United States, developed the following exercise for students:

A middle-age man is waiting at a bus stop. He has just learned that his son has died violently. Describe the setting from the man’s point of view WITHOUT telling your reader what has happened. How will the street look to this man? What are the sounds? Odors? Colors? That this man will notice? What will his clothes feel like? Write a 250 word description.

I did a slightly different topic that I don’t feel comfortable sharing with the several billion? people who use the internet, but I don’t mind if anyone wants to read it, I think I came close tocracking the killer exercise but it’s not pasted here… Actually yeah I think I cracked it but considering the likely types to read my blog that doesn’t belong here.

Also it is a rather morbid topic, no one needs anyone to die violently, but it really is very difficult to get into that middle aged mans head so I went with a variation that makes more sense to me considering the stage of life I’m in and so forth.

Maybe I’ll paste it here one day.

And this is the other writing exercise we did on the day.

Writing exercise:
A cellphone has just been found by a caveman. What happens?

Answer:

The weird rock on the slab starts to make noise, weird noise, and it’s shaking. I look at it and wonder what he is showing me, why he thinks it’s so important, we have work to do to survive and I’m actually really hungry.
Still, he’s the shaman of the tribe and this is our secret, he says it is magic and powerful but I see nothing in it.
I am preoccupied with thoughts of game.
Later it dies, becomes inert, the flashing is gone and the light is gone and some of the symbols have faded to grey.
The shaman always said it was important, we started to worship it. I never did, I believe in the gods of the Wind and the Rain, the Antelope and the Lion, but others, they all believe him when he says it is a message from the powerful ones, and they believe what he says.
It takes our focus away from survival, distracts us from the game or the food, and what little there is we give to the shrine, and the shaman grows larger.
We’ll leave soon, this is madness, and I remember the old gods, not the falsehoods the shaman spews, that it came from a time out of time.

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , ,

The Master Thief

Found this fairy tale online, it’s quite long but very cute.
Also quite a practical set of demands really, much riches and the Governor’s daughter, what more could you want apart from well I don’t know, the governors job ;0.

Original site: http://www.rickwalton.com/folktale/red06.htm

The Master-maid is very nice aswell, everyone sometimes needs a little help, if you go to the actual link and click next you’ll find it. Hope you have an analytical and honest mind.

The Master Thief


THERE was once upon a time a husbandman who had three sons. He had no property to bequeath to them, and no means of putting them in the way of getting a living, and did not know what to do, so he said that they had his leave to take to anything they most fancied, and go to any place they best liked. He would gladly accompany them for some part of their way, he said, and that he did. He went with them till they came to a place where three roads met, and there each of them took his own way, and the father bade them farewell and returned to his own home again. What became of the two elder I have never been able to discover, but the youngest went both far and wide.

It came to pass, one night, as he was going through a great wood, that a terrible storm came on. It blew so hard and rained so heavily that he could scarcely keep his eyes open, and before he was aware of it he had got quite out of the track, and could neither find road nor path. But he went on, and at last he saw a light far away in the wood. Then he thought he must try and get to it, and after a long, long time he did reach it. There was a large house, and the fire was burning so brightly inside that he could tell that the people were not in bed. So he went in, and inside there was an old woman who was busy about some work.

`Good evening, mother!’ said the youth.

`Good evening!’ said the old woman.

`Hutetu! it is terrible weather outside to-night,’ said the young fellow.

`Indeed it is,’ said the old woman.

`Can I sleep here, and have shelter for the night?’ asked the youth.

`It wouldn’t be good for you to sleep here,’ said the old hag, `for if the people of the house come home and find you, they will kill both you and me.’

`What kind of people are they then, who dwell here?’ said the youth.

`Oh! robbers, and rabble of that sort,’ said the old woman; `they stole me away when I was little, and I have had to keep house for them ever since.’

`I still think I will go to bed, all the same,’ said the youth. `No matter what happens, I’ll not go out to-night in such weather as this.’

`Well, then, it will be the worse for yourself,’ said the old woman.

The young man lay down in a bed which stood near, but he dared not go to sleep: and it was better that he didn’t, for the robbers came, and the old woman said that a young fellow who was a stranger had come there, and she had not been able to get him to go away again.

`Did you see if he had any money?’ said the robbers.

`He’s not one to have money, he is a tramp! If he has a few clothes to his back, that is all.’

Then the robbers began to mutter to each other apart about what they should do with him, whether they should murder him, or what else they should do. In the meantime the boy got up and began to talk to them, and ask them if they did not want a man- servant, for he could find pleasure enough in serving them.

`Yes,’ said they, `if you have a mind to take to the trade that we follow, you may have a place here.’

`It’s all the same to me what trade I follow,’ said the youth, `for when I came away from home my father gave me leave to take to any trade I fancied.’

`Have you a fancy for stealing, then?’ said the robbers.

`Yes,’ said the boy, for he thought that was a trade which would not take long to learn.

Not very far off there dwelt a man who had three oxen, one of which he was to take to the town to sell. The robbers had heard of this, so they told the youth that if he were able to steal the ox from him on the way, without his knowing, and without doing him any harm, he should have leave to be their servant-man. So the youth set off, taking with him a pretty shoe with a silver buckle that was lying about in the house. He put this in the road by which the man must go with his ox, and then went into the wood and hid himself under a bush. When the man came up he at once saw the shoe.

`That’s a brave shoe,’ said he. `If I had but the fellow to it, I would carry it home with me, and then I should put my old woman into a good humour for once.’

For he had a wife who was so cross and ill-tempered that the time between the beatings she gave him was very short. But then he bethought himself that he could do nothing with one shoe if he had not the fellow to it, so he journeyed onwards and let it lie where it was. Then the youth picked up the shoe and hurried off away through the wood as fast as he was able, to get in front of the man, and then put the shoe in the road before him again.

When the man came with the ox and saw the shoe, he was quite vexed at having been so stupid as to leave the fellow to it lying where it was, instead of bringing it on with him.

`I will just run back again and fetch it now,’ he said to himself, `and then I shall take back a pair of good shoes to the old woman, and she may perhaps throw a kind word to me for once.’

So he went and searched and searched for the other shoe for a long, long time, but no shoe was to be found, and at last he was forced to go back with the one which he had.

In the meantime the youth had taken the ox and gone off with it. When the man got there and found that his ox was gone, he began to weep and wail, for he was afraid that when his old woman got to know she would be the death of him. But all at once it came into his head to go home and get the other ox, and drive it to the town, and take good care that his old wife knew nothing about it. So he did this; he went home and took the ox without his wife’s knowing about it, and went on his way to the town with it. But the robbers they knew it well, because they got out their magic. So they told the youth that if he could take this ox also without the man knowing anything about it, and without doing him any hurt, he should then be on an equality with them.

`Well, that will not be a very hard thing to do,’ thought the youth.

This time he took with him a rope and put it under his arms and tied himself up to a tree, which hung over the road that the man would have to take. So the man came with his ox, and when he saw the body hanging there he felt a little queer.

`What a hard lot yours must have been to make you hang yourself!’ said he. `Ah, well! you may hang there for me; I can’t breathe life into you again.’

So on he went with his ox. Then the youth sprang down from the tree, ran by a short cut and got before him, and once more hung himself up on a tree in the road before the man.

`How I should like to know if you really were so sick at heart that you hanged yourself there, or if it is only a hobgoblin that’s before me!’ said the man. `Ah, well! you may hang there for me, whether you are a hobgoblin or not,’ and on he went with his ox.

Once more the youth did just as he had done twice already; jumped down from the tree, ran by a short cut through the wood, and again hanged himself in the very middle of the road before him.

But when the man once more saw this he said to himself, `What a bad business this is! Can they all have been so heavy. hearted that they have all three hanged themselves? No, I can’t believe that it is anything but witchcraft! But I will know the truth,’ he said; `if the two others are still hanging there it is true but if they are not it’s nothing else but witchcraft.’

So he tied up his ox and ran back to see if they really were hanging there. While he was going, and looking up at every tree as he went, the youth leapt down and took his ox and went off with it. Any one may easily imagine what a fury the man fell into when he came back and saw that his ox was gone. He wept and he raged, but at last he took comfort and told himself that the best thing to do was to go home and take the third ox, without letting his wife know anything about it, and then try to sell it so well that he got a good sum of money for it. So he went home and took the third ox, and drove it off without his wife knowing anything about it. But the robbers knew all about it, and they told the youth that if he could steal this as he had stolen the two others, he should be master of the whole troop. So the youth set out and went to the wood, and when the man was coming along with the ox he began to bellow loudly, just like a great ox somewhere inside the wood. When the man heard that he was right glad, for he fancied he recognised the voice of his big bullock, and thought that now he should find both of them again. So he tied up the third, and ran away off the road to look for them in the wood. In the meantime the youth went away with the third ox. When the man returned and found that he had lost that too, he fell into such a rage that there was no bounds to it. He wept and lamented, and for many days he did not dare to go home again, for he was afraid that the old woman would slay him outright. The robbers, also, were not very well pleased at this, for they were forced to own that the youth was at the head of them all. So one day they made up their minds to set to work to do something which it was not in his power to accomplish, and they all took to the road together, and left him at home alone. When they were well out of the house, the first thing that he did was to drive the oxen out on the road, whereupon they all ran home again to the man from whom he had stolen them, and right glad was the husbandman to see them. Then he brought out all the horses the robbers had, and loaded them with the most valuable things which he could find– vessels of gold and of silver, and clothes and other magnificent things–and then he told the old woman to greet the robbers from him and thank them from him, and say that he had gone away, and that they would have a great deal of difficulty in finding him again, and with that he drove the horses out of the courtyard. After a long, long time he came to the road on which he was travelling when he came to the robbers. And when he had got very near home, and was in sight of the house where his father lived, he put on a uniform which he had found among the things he had taken from the robbers, and which was made just like a general’s, and drove into the yard just as if he were a great man. Then he entered the house and asked if he could find a lodging there.

`No, indeed you can’t!’ said his father. `How could I possibly be able to lodge such a great gentleman as you? It is all that I can do to find clothes and bedding for myself, and wretched they are.’

`You were always a hard man,’ said the youth, `and hard you are still if you refuse to let your own son come into your house.’

`Are you my son?’ said the man.

`Do you not know me again then?’ said the youth.

Then he recognised him and said, `But what trade have you taken to that has made you such a great man in so short a time?’

`Oh, that I will tell you,’ answered the youth. `You said that I might take to anything I liked, so I apprenticed myself to some thieves and robbers, and now I have served my time and have become Master Thief.’

Now the Governor of the province lived by his father’s cottage, and this Governor had such a large house and so much money that he did not even know how much it was, and he had a daughter too who was both pretty and dainty, and good and wise. So the Master Thief was determined to have her to wife, and told his father that he was to go to the Governor, and ask for his daughter for him. `If he asks what trade I follow, you may say that I am a Master Thief,’ said he.

`I think you must be crazy,’ said the man, `for you can’t be in your senses if you think of anything so foolish.’

`You must go to the Governor and beg for his daughter–there is no help,’ said the youth.

`But I dare not go to the Governor and say this. He is so rich and has so much wealth of all kinds,’ said the man.

`There is no help for it,’ said the Master Thief; `go you must, whether you like it or not. If I can’t get you to go by using good words, I will soon make you go with bad ones.’

But the man was still unwilling, so the Master Thief followed him, threatening him with a great birch stick, till he went weeping and wailing through the door to the Governor of the province.

`Now, my man, and what’s amiss with you?’ said the Governor.

So he told him that he had three sons who had gone away one day, and how he had given them permission to go where they chose, and take to whatsoever work they fancied. `Now,’ he said, `the youngest of them has come home, and has threatened me till I have come to you to ask for your daughter for him, and I am to say that he is a Master Thief,’ and again the man fell a-weeping and lamenting.

`Console yourself, my man,’ said the Governor, laughing. `You may tell him from me that he must first give me some proof of this. If he can steal the joint off the spit in the kitchen on Sunday, when every one of us is watching it, he shall have my daughter. Will you tell him that?’

The man did tell him, and the youth thought it would be easy enough to do it. So he set himself to work to catch three hares alive, put them in a bag, clad himself in some old rags so that he looked so poor and wretched that it was quite pitiable to see him, and in this guise on Sunday forenoon he sneaked into the passage with his bag, like any beggar boy. The Governor himself and every one in the house was in the kitchen, keeping watch over the joint. While they were doing this the youth let one of the hares slip out of his bag, and off it set and began to run round the yard.

`Just look at that hare,’ said the people in the kitchen, and wanted to go out and catch it.

The Governor saw it too, but said, `Oh, let it go! it’s no use to think of catching a hare when it’s running away.’

It was not long before the youth let another hare out, and the people in the kitchen saw this too, and thought that it was the same. So again they wanted to go out and catch it, but the Governor again told them that it was of no use to try.

Very soon afterwards, however, the youth let slip the third hare, and it set off and ran round and round the courtyard. The people in the kitchen saw this too, and believed that it was still the same hare that was running about, so they wanted to go out and catch it.

`It’s a remarkably fine hare!’ said the Governor. `Come and let us see if we can get hold of it.’ So out he went, and the others with him, and away went the hare, and they after it, in real earnest.

In the meantime, however, the Master Thief took the joint and ran off with it, and whether the Governor got any roast meat for his dinner that day I know not, but I know that he had no roast hare, though he chased it till he was both hot and tired. At noon came the Priest, and when the Governor had told him of the trick played by the Master Thief there was no end to the ridicule he cast on the Governor.

`For my part,’ said the Priest, `I can’t imagine myself being made a fool of by such a fellow as that!’

`Well, I advise you to be careful,’ said the Governor, `for he may be with you before you are at all aware.’

But the Priest repeated what he had said, and mocked the Governor for having allowed himself to be made such a fool of.

Later in the afternoon the Master Thief came and wanted to have the Governor’s daughter as he had promised.

`You must first give some more samples of your skill,’ said the Governor, trying to speak him fair, `for what you did to-day was no such very great thing after all. Couldn’t you play off a really good trick on the Priest? for he is sitting inside there and calling me a fool for having let myself be taken in by such a fellow as you.’

`Well, it wouldn’t be very hard to do that,’ said the Master Thief. So he dressed himself up like a bird, and threw a great white sheet over himself; broke off a goose’s wings, and set them on his back; and in this attire climbed into a great maple tree which stood in the Priest’s garden. So when the Priest returned home in the evening the youth began to cry, `Father Lawrence! Father Lawrence! `for the Priest was called Father Lawrence.

`Who is calling me?’ said the Priest.

`I am an angel sent to announce to thee that because of thy piety thou shalt be taken away alive into heaven,’ said the Master Thief. `Wilt thou hold thyself in readiness to travel away next Monday night? for then will I come and fetch thee, and bear thee away with me in a sack, and thou must lay all thy gold and silver, and whatsoever thou may ’st possess of this world’s wealth, in a heap in thy best parlour.’

So Father Lawrence fell down on his knees before the angel and thanked him, and the following Sunday he preached a farewell sermon, and gave out that an angel had come down into the large maple tree in his garden, and had announced to him that, because of his righteousness, he should be taken up alive into heaven, and as he thus preached and told them this everyone in the church, old or young, wept.

On Monday night the Master Thief once more came as an angel, and before the Priest was put into the sack he fell on his knees and thanked him; but no sooner was the Priest safely inside it than the Master Thief began to drag him away over stocks and stones.

`Oh! oh! `cried the Priest in the sack. `Where are you taking me?’

`This is the way to heaven. The way to heaven is not an easy one,’ said the Master Thief, and dragged him along till he all but killed him.

At last he flung him into the Governor’s goose-house, and the geese began to hiss and peck at him, till he felt more dead than alive.

`Oh! oh! oh! Where am I now?’ asked the Priest.

`Now you are in Purgatory,’ said the Master Thief, and off he went and took the gold and the silver and all the precious things which the Priest had laid together in his best parlour.

Next morning, when the goose-girl came to let out the geese, she heard the Priest bemoaning himself as he lay in the sack in the goose-house.

`Oh, heavens! who is that, and what ails you?’ said she.

`Oh,’ said the Priest, `if you are an angel from heaven do let me out and let me go back to earth again, for no place was ever so bad as this–the little fiends nip me so with their tongs.’

`I am no angel,’ said the girl, and helped the Priest out of the sack. `I only look after the Governor’s geese, that’s what I do, and they are the little fiends which have pinched your reverence.’

`This is the Master Thief’s doing! Oh, my gold and my silver and my best clothes!’ shrieked the Priest, and, wild with rage, he ran home so fast that the goose-girl thought he had suddenly gone mad.

When the Governor learnt what had happened to the Priest he laughed till he nearly killed himself, but when the Master Thief came and wanted to have his daughter according to promise, he once more gave him nothing but fine words, and said, `You must give me one more proof of your skill, so that I can really judge of your worth. I have twelve horses in my stable, and I will put twelve stable boys in it, one on each horse. If you are clever enough to steal the horses from under them, I will see what I can do for you.’

`What you set me to do can be done,’ said the Master Thief, `but am I certain to get your daughter when it is?’

`Yes; if you can do that I will do my best for you,’ said the Governor.

So the Master Thief went to a shop, and bought enough brandy to fill two pocket flasks, and he put a sleeping drink into one of these, but into the other he poured brandy only. Then he engaged eleven men to lie that night in hiding behind the Governor’s stable. After this, by fair words and good payment, he borrowed a ragged gown and a jerkin from an aged woman, and then, with a staff in his hand and a poke on his back, he hobbled off as evening came on towards the Governor’s stable. The stable boys were just watering the horses for the night, and it was quite as much as they could do to attend to that.

`What on earth do you want here?’ said one of them to the old woman.

`Oh dear! oh dear! How cold it is!’ she said, sobbing, and shivering with cold. `Oh dear! oh dear! it’s cold enough to freeze a poor old body to death!’ and she shivered and shook again, and said, `For heaven’s sake give me leave to stay here and sit just inside the stable door.’

`You will get nothing of the kind! Be off this moment! If the Governor were to catch sight of you here, he would lead us a pretty dance,’ said one.

`Oh! what a poor helpless old creature!’ said another, who felt sorry for her. `That poor old woman can do no harm to anyone. She may sit there and welcome.’

The rest of them thought that she ought not to stay, but while they were disputing about this and looking after the horses, she crept farther and farther into the stable, and at last sat down behind the door, and when once she was inside no one took any more notice of her.

As the night wore on the stable boys found it rather cold work to sit still on horseback.

`Hutetu! But it is fearfully cold!’ said one, and began to beat his arms backwards and forwards across his breast.

`Yes, I am so cold that my teeth are chattering,’ said another.

`If one had but a little tobacco,’ said a third.

Well, one of them had a little, so they shared it among them, though there was very little for each man, but they chewed it. This was some help to them, but very soon they were just as cold as before.

`Hutetu!’ said one of them, shivering again.

`Hutetu!’ said the old woman, gnashing her teeth together till they chattered inside her mouth; and then she got out the flask which contained nothing but brandy, and her hands trembled so that she shook the bottle about, and when she drank it made a great gulp in her throat.

`What is that you have in your flask, old woman?’ asked one of the stable boys.

`Oh, it’s only a little drop of brandy, your honour,’ she said.

`Brandy! What! Let me have a drop! Let me have a drop!’ screamed all the twelve at once.

`Oh, but what I have is so little,’ whimpered the old woman. `It will not even wet your mouths.’

But they were determined to have it, and there was nothing to be done but give it; so she took out the flask with the sleeping drink and put it to the lips of the first of them; and now she shook no more, but guided the flask so that each of them got just as much as he ought, and the twelfth had not done drinking before the first was already sitting snoring. Then the Master Thief flung off his beggar’s rags, and took one stable boy after the other and gently set him astride on the partitions which divided the stalls, and then he called his eleven men who were waiting outside, and they rode off with the Governor’s horses.

In the morning when the Governor came to look after his stable boys they were just beginning to come to again. They were driving their spurs into the partition till the splinters flew about, and some of the boys fell off, and some still hung on and sat looking like fools. `Ah, well,’ said the Governor, `it is easy to see who has been here; but what a worthless set of fellows you must be to sit here and let the Master Thief steal the horses from under you!’ And they all got a beating for not having kept watch better.

Later in the day the Master Thief came and related what he had done, and wanted to have the Governor’s daughter as had been promised. But the Governor gave him a hundred dollars, and said that he must do something that was better still.

`Do you think you can steal my horse from under me when I am out riding on it?’ said he.

`Well, it might be done,’ said the Master Thief, `if I were absolutely certain that I should get your daughter.’

So the Governor said that he would see what he could do, and then he said that on a certain day he would ride out to a great common where they drilled the soldiers.

So the Master Thief immediately got hold of an old worn-out mare, and set himself to work to make a collar for it of green withies and branches of broom; bought a shabby old cart and a great cask, and then he told a poor old beggar woman that he would give her ten dollars if she would get into the cask and keep her mouth wide- open beneath the tap-hole, into which he was going to stick his finger. No harm should happen to her, he said; she should only be driven about a little, and if he took his finger out more than once, she should have ten dollars more. Then he dressed himself in rags, dyed himself with soot, and put on a wig and a great beard of goat’s hair, so that it was impossible to recognise him, and went to the parade ground, where the Governor had already been riding about a long time.

When the Master Thief got there the mare went along so slowly and quietly that the cart hardly seemed to move from the spot. The mare pulled it a little forward, and then a little back, and then it stopped quite short. Then the mare pulled a little forward again, and it moved with such difficulty that the Governor had not the least idea that this was the Master Thief. He rode straight up to him, and asked if he had seen anyone hiding anywhere about in a wood that was close by.

`No,’ said the man, `that have I not.’

`Hark you,’ said the Governor. `If you will ride into that wood, and search it carefully to see if you can light upon a fellow who is hiding in there, you shall have the loan of my horse and a good present of money for your trouble.’

`I am not sure that I can do it,’ said the man, `for I have to go to a wedding with this cask of mead which I have been to fetch, and the tap has fallen out on the way, so now I have to keep my finger in the tap-hole as I drive.’

`Oh, just ride off,’ said the Governor, `and I will look after the cask and the horse too.’

So the man said that if he would do that he would go, but he begged the Governor to be very careful to put his finger into the tap-hole the moment he took his out.

So the Governor said that he would do his very best, and the Master Thief got on the Governor’s horse.

But time passed, and it grew later and later, and still the man did not come back, and at last the Governor grew so weary of keeping his finger in the tap-hole that he took it out.

`Now I shall have ten dollars more!’ cried the old woman inside the cask; so he soon saw what kind of mead it was, and set out homewards. When he had gone a very little way he met his servant bringing him the horse, for the Master Thief had already taken it home.

The following day he went to the Governor and wanted to have his daughter according to promise. But the Governor again put him off with fine words, and only gave him three hundred dollars, saying that he must do one more masterpiece of skill, and if he were but able to do that he should have her.

Well, the Master Thief thought he might if he could hear what it was.

`Do you think you can steal the sheet off our bed, and my wife’s night-gown?’ said the Governor.

`That is by no means impossible,’ said the Master Thief. `I only wish I could get your daughter as easily.’

So late at night the Master Thief went and cut down a thief who was hanging on the gallows, laid him on his own shoulders, and took him away with him. Then he got hold of a long ladder, set it up against the Governor’s bedroom window, and climbed up and moved the dead man’s head up and down, just as if he were some one who was standing outside and peeping in.

`There’s the Master Thief, mother!’ said the Governor, nudging his wife. `Now I’ll just shoot him, that I will!’

So he took up a rifle which he had laid at his bedside.

`Oh no, you must not do that,’ said his wife; `you yourself arranged that he was to come here.’

`Yes, mother, I will shoot him,’ said he, and lay there aiming, and then aiming again, for no sooner was the head up and he caught sight of it than it was gone again. At last he got a chance and fired, and the dead body fell with a loud thud to the ground, and down went the Master Thief too, as fast as he could.

`Well,’ said the Governor, `I certainly am the chief man about here, but people soon begin to talk, and it would be very unpleasant if they were to see this dead body; the best thing that I can do is to go out and bury him.’

`Just do what you think best, father,’ said his wife.

So the Governor got up and went downstairs, and as soon as he had gone out through the door, the Master Thief stole in and went straight upstairs to the woman.

`Well, father dear,’ said she, for she thought it was her husband. `Have you got done already?’

`Oh yes, I only put him into a hole,’ said he, `and raked a little earth over him; that’s all I have been able to do to-night, for it is fearful weather outside. I will bury him better afterwards, but just let me have the sheet to wipe myself with, for he was bleeding, and I have got covered with blood with carrying him.’

So she gave him the sheet.

`You will have to let me have your night-gown too,’ he said, `for I begin to see that the sheet won’t be enough.’

Then she gave him her night-gown, but just then it came into his head that he had forgotten to lock the door, and he was forced to go downstairs and do it before he could lie down in bed again. So off he went with the sheet, and the night-gown too.

An hour later the real Governor returned.

`Well, what a time it has taken to lock the house door, father!’ said his wife, `and what have you done with the sheet and the night-gown?’

`What do you mean?’ asked the Governor.

`Oh, I am asking you what you have done with the night-gown and sheet that you got to wipe the blood off yourself with,’ said she.

`Good heavens!’ said the Governor, `has he actually got the better of me again?’

When day came the Master Thief came too, and wanted to have the Governor’s daughter as had been promised, and the Governor dared do no otherwise than give her to him, and much money besides, for he feared that if he did not the Master Thief might steal the very eyes out of his head, and that he himself would be ill spoken of by all men. The Master Thief lived well and happily from that time forth, and whether he ever stole any more or not I cannot tell you, but if he did it was but for pastime.

(From P. C. Asbjornsen.)

(from The Red Fairy Book, edited by Andrew Lang)

Filed under: Uncategorized , , , , , , , , ,

Is there a meaning to life?

When I’m hungry, the meaning of life is food, it’s that simple.

We are ultimately simply beasts that obey our primal urges when everything gets dire enough, but before then we manage the facade of society, democracy and law and order quite well.

But really, I’m quite hungry and food sounds like something well worth having.

My life has deevolved into a monotony of nights alone on the computer, browsing esoteric information like the EMT-7 emp blast creator used to defuse mines in the late cold war, smoking too many cigarettes, re-clocking old video games and reenactments of world war two infantry conflict (this is like the dam busters moment in the Pink Floyd album “The Wall”), staying at home in bed lots and letting life pass me by.

There is no exhilerating story here, nothing but an old painting abandoned to age, no lingering memories and just a strange memory of when the internet was young.

Filed under: food, life , , , , , , , ,

Legalise it!

I’ve joined the Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis Party, $2 for a years membership, I feel good about that, I’m not going to vote Labour until they change their policy with regards to the legalisation of cannabis, so unfortunately they are going to lose my support.

The current scenario is absolutely ridiculous, with young people being oppressed by someone elses moral code, drug laws that date back 30 years and have done nothing but destroy peoples lives, people who were trying to enjoy life, and these interruptions have limited peoples employability, contributed to general unwellness in the population, poisoned people through the usage of unsafe aerial sprays, traumatised people through excessive police raids, and ultimately helped the gangs make millions of dollars at the tax payers expense, and the scenario needs to change.

Personal usage and personal cultivation need to be legal.

I’m currently facing one charge of possession of cannabis for personal, and if convicted I sure aren’t going to hang around NZ. I mean lets face it, why would I want to live here when I can load up my EU passport, fly to Amsterdam, get paid more, live in an awesome country, and smoke as much weed as I like completely legally. I doubt NZ would miss me that much, and Mr. Cullen appears to be encouarging immigration to Australia. If I was in some states of Australia I would be facing a $50 fine, as it is the process involves multiple court appearances, and a huge waste of money, while the police complain that they have insufficient resources to deal with real crime.

And we wonder why the brain drain is happening.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Option 3

A collection of thoughts and ideas on various topics.

save